For years, Bitcoin and gold advocates have fought over which is the true antidote to a broken monetary system. But before we dive into who’s right, it’s important to recognize where both sides actually agree: the system itself is the problem.
Both camps see clearly that centralized, inflationary monetary policy steadily erodes purchasing power, hollowing out economies and setting the stage for political and social upheaval. History is littered with examples—from the Weimar Republic to 1930s Germany—of what happens when monetary rot gives way to civil chaos and authoritarian “solutions.”
The disagreement between Bitcoiners and goldbugs isn’t about the need for change—it’s about the vehicle for it.
And frankly, both Michael Saylor (Bitcoin’s loudest evangelist) and Frank Giustra (gold’s steadfast defender) are missing the bigger picture in their historic debates.
Let’s start with Bitcoin.
Bitcoin is not money. Nor is it a true store of value. It’s a brilliant blockchain-based payments innovation, yes. But to pretend Bitcoin is a “risk-free asset” or a “new gold” (as Mr. Saylor does) is intellectually dishonest.
The fatal flaw? Bitcoin’s inelasticity.
Much like gold before it, Bitcoin cannot expand to meet the liquidity needs of a central bank-dominated world. Capped at 21 million coins, Bitcoin cannot and will not ever fit into a system predicated on money supply manipulation. That’s why gold was abandoned, and why Bitcoin will never be embraced by those who pull the real financial levers.
Mr. Saylor conveniently forgets that gold didn’t fall from monetary grace because it lacked value—it fell because it lacked political utility. Bitcoin faces the same fate, only faster. Meanwhile, Mr. Giustra rightly points out that gold remains a superior store of value, forged by thousands of years of human trust. But he overlooks another hard reality: traditional gold mining is increasingly incompatible with modern investor values. Environmental destruction, social displacement, and finite production growth have made gold mining not only costly—but socially toxic.
In short:
- Bitcoin is politically incompatible.
- Gold is environmentally unsustainable.
- Both are structurally outdated.
This is where NatGold breaks the stalemate.
NatGold delivers the best of both worlds—without the baggage.
- Like Bitcoin, NatGold harnesses the efficiencies of blockchain technology.
- Like gold, NatGold offers 100% intrinsic value backing.
- Unlike Bitcoin, NatGold does not waste global energy resources.
It takes days, not decades, to digitally mine gold’s value through NatGold’s patent-pending process. The energy footprint is negligible. There’s no destruction of rivers, mountains, or communities. Just real, certified value—captured digitally, delivered cleanly.
And critically, NatGold solves the fatal flaw that destroyed gold’s role in the monetary system and that Bitcoin cannot overcome: elasticity.
NatGold gives policymakers the flexibility they demand without forcing society to accept inflationary fiat or environmentally catastrophic mining practices. It preserves the soul of gold while upgrading its utility for a 21st-century world.
There’s no need to pick sides anymore.
- Bitcoiners seeking decentralization can find it here—without sacrificing resource sustainability.
- Gold investors seeking real value preservation can find it here—without funding ecological damage.
It’s time for Mr. Saylor and Mr. Giustra to realize that the real future isn’t in reviving old battles—it’s in forging a better path forward. One where blockchain and gold work together, not against each other.
NatGold is that path.
A sustainable, elastic, blockchain-native, gold-backed asset that speaks to the true spirit of monetary freedom—without repeating the fatal mistakes of the past.
NatGold: It Just Makes Sense.
Bitcoin vs. Gold: The Debate That Misses the Point—and How NatGold Gets It Right
Bitcoin vs. Gold: The Debate That Misses the Point—and How NatGold Gets It Right
For years, Bitcoin and gold advocates have fought over which is the true antidote to a broken monetary system. But before we dive into who’s right, it’s important to recognize where both sides actually agree: the system itself is the problem.
Both camps see clearly that centralized, inflationary monetary policy steadily erodes purchasing power, hollowing out economies and setting the stage for political and social upheaval. History is littered with examples—from the Weimar Republic to 1930s Germany—of what happens when monetary rot gives way to civil chaos and authoritarian “solutions.”
The disagreement between Bitcoiners and goldbugs isn’t about the need for change—it’s about the vehicle for it.
And frankly, both Michael Saylor (Bitcoin’s loudest evangelist) and Frank Giustra (gold’s steadfast defender) are missing the bigger picture in their historic debates.
Let’s start with Bitcoin.
Bitcoin is not money. Nor is it a true store of value. It’s a brilliant blockchain-based payments innovation, yes. But to pretend Bitcoin is a “risk-free asset” or a “new gold” (as Mr. Saylor does) is intellectually dishonest.
The fatal flaw? Bitcoin’s inelasticity.
Much like gold before it, Bitcoin cannot expand to meet the liquidity needs of a central bank-dominated world. Capped at 21 million coins, Bitcoin cannot and will not ever fit into a system predicated on money supply manipulation. That’s why gold was abandoned, and why Bitcoin will never be embraced by those who pull the real financial levers.
Mr. Saylor conveniently forgets that gold didn’t fall from monetary grace because it lacked value—it fell because it lacked political utility. Bitcoin faces the same fate, only faster. Meanwhile, Mr. Giustra rightly points out that gold remains a superior store of value, forged by thousands of years of human trust. But he overlooks another hard reality: traditional gold mining is increasingly incompatible with modern investor values. Environmental destruction, social displacement, and finite production growth have made gold mining not only costly—but socially toxic.
In short:
This is where NatGold breaks the stalemate.
NatGold delivers the best of both worlds—without the baggage.
It takes days, not decades, to digitally mine gold’s value through NatGold’s patent-pending process. The energy footprint is negligible. There’s no destruction of rivers, mountains, or communities. Just real, certified value—captured digitally, delivered cleanly.
And critically, NatGold solves the fatal flaw that destroyed gold’s role in the monetary system and that Bitcoin cannot overcome: elasticity.
NatGold gives policymakers the flexibility they demand without forcing society to accept inflationary fiat or environmentally catastrophic mining practices. It preserves the soul of gold while upgrading its utility for a 21st-century world.
There’s no need to pick sides anymore.
It’s time for Mr. Saylor and Mr. Giustra to realize that the real future isn’t in reviving old battles—it’s in forging a better path forward. One where blockchain and gold work together, not against each other.
NatGold is that path.
A sustainable, elastic, blockchain-native, gold-backed asset that speaks to the true spirit of monetary freedom—without repeating the fatal mistakes of the past.
NatGold: It Just Makes Sense.
This commentary was written by Anthony Wile, NatGold CEO and Director.
The views expressed in this editorial represent the personal opinions and insights of Anthony Wile. While NatGold Digital Ltd. supports open dialogue on the future of finance, sustainable investing, and tokenized assets, these views do not necessarily reflect the official policies or positions of the company or its affiliates. NatGold Digital Ltd. publishes these perspectives to foster informed discussion among our community of supporters and stakeholders.
Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!
Invest With Us
Join the pioneer of digital gold mining as we reshape the multi-trillion gold investment industry. Positioned at the intersection of three of the world’s most powerful investment trends–gold, the tokenization of real-world assets, and ESG-conscious investing—NatGold Digital is primed for outstanding, long-term growth.